ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
High-throughput virus quantification using cytopathic effect area analysis.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional infectivity-based virion quantification methods, such as 50% tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50) and plaque assays, are typically performed in 6-, 12-, 24-, or 48-well cell culture plates and require manual work and analysis based on legacy protocols. Adaptation of these methods to high-throughput formats (96-, 384- or 1,536-well plates) is challenging due to both assay automation constraints and the lack of well surface area available for reliable analysis. Here, we present a scalable alternative to traditional methods that uses whole-well image thresholding to quantify infectious virions by measuring virus-induced cytopathic effect (CPE) via cell lysis and detachment. The CPE area assay is best positioned as a practical high-throughput preliminary screening tool, effectively quantifying samples within the assay range and flagging samples above or below the concentration thresholds. To improve analysis efficiency and reduce user bias in CPE area selection, we evaluated an nnU-Net model for automated image segmentation against images segmented by manually defined brightness thresholds. The model achieved strong correlation with manual thresholding (R2 = 1.00), showing minimal differences in the identified CPE area and thus demonstrating that nnU-Net accurately reproduces manual analysis. This approach provides two complementary pipelines: manual thresholding, which tolerates adjustments of hyperparameters, and fully automated segmentation via nnU-Net, which streamlines analysis and enhances throughput. This flexible CPE area assay enables accurate and automated quantification in high-throughput screening formats, thereby greatly accelerating a routine laboratory task while decreasing subjectivity and bias.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.