Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42748163›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Who gets connected? Open government data and access to intercity innovation networks.

Yutong Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yutong LiuSchool of Economics and Trade, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0726-2957

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Who gains access to intercity innovation networks when governments publish data online? We examine this question using the staggered launch of municipal open government data (OGD) platforms across Chinese prefecture-level cities from 2010 to 2023. Using city-pair patent records reconstructed as unique unordered pair-year observations, a difference-in-differences (DID) design estimates a 0.169-log-point increase in intercity joint patenting after platform adoption. This effect is not uniform. The increase is larger among cities with fewer pre-treatment partners and weaker commercial-credit, financial, digital, and market-support environments, precisely where private information channels are thinnest. Platform adoption is also associated with broader partner networks, stronger bilateral ties, and more cross-province collaboration. The evidence is consistent with standardized public information substituting for missing private search, reputation, and verification channels. However, it does not establish portal use as the causal mediator or demonstrate a decline in overall spatial inequality. The findings identify a network-entry margin through which public data infrastructure can generate unequal local returns.

Identifiers

PMID42748163
PMCPMC13580989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.