Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42748109›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Describing well-being in the US by race/ethnicity, education level, and urbanicity: A cross-sectional study using the Gallup National Health and Well Being Index.

Brita Roy, Jeph Herrin, Erica S Spatz, Kiarri N Kershaw, Dan Witters, Harlan M Krumholz, Carley Riley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Brita RoySection for Health Equity, Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America.
Jeph HerrinSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Erica S SpatzSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Kiarri N KershawDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Dan WittersGallup, Inc., Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America.
Harlan M KrumholzSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2046-127X
Carley RileyThe Nova Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For a more comprehensive understanding of health disparities, consideration must be given not only to morbidity and mortality outcomes but also to more holistic health-related constructs, such as well-being. We assessed differences in well-being across sociodemographic subgroups in the United States (US). We used data from the Gallup National Health and Well-being Index (2014-2016, n = 530,920) to assess independent cross-sectional associations of self-reported race, ethnicity, educational attainment, and rural residence with measures of well-being for non-institutionalized residents from 50 US states and the District of Columbia. Our outcome measures are thriving, calculated from self-reported current and future life evaluation, and the composite Well-Being Index (WBI), calculated from 38 self-reported metrics spanning 5 domains of well-being (Career, Community, Physical, Financial, Social). We summarized these measures for race-education-urban subgroups and tested for interactions among these three factors, before and after adjustment for year of survey completion, age, sex, marital status, household size, and income. Among our sample, 55% were thriving. After adjustment, higher levels of education were associated with increased odds of thriving: compared with those with no high school degree, we found higher odds of thriving for respondents reporting completion of high school/technical school/some college (OR=1.61(1.57,1.66)), college (OR=2.77(2.69,2.85)), and postgraduate (OR=3.38 (3.29,3.49)) education. Compared with White respondents, Black (OR (95% CI)=1.15 (1.12,1.17)) and Hispanic (OR=1.26 (1.23,1.29)) respondents had higher odds of thriving; results were similar for WBI, except Asian respondents had also higher WBI after adjustment for all covariates (OR=2.54 (2.28,2.80)). Across race-education-urban subgroups, non-White respondents with a college degree living in urban and rural areas had the highest odds of thriving; White respondents with no college degree living in urban areas had the lowest odds of thriving (p < 0.001 for each), after adjustment. These findings raise questions about how well-being is mediated given the known worse clinical health measures among minoritized groups.

Indexed as

Educational StatusEthnicityRacial GroupsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychological Well-BeingRural PopulationSocioeconomic Disparities in HealthUnited StatesUrban PopulationWhiteYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42748109
PMCPMC13580990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.