Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42748089›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Open wide: Identifying North Atlantic right whale feeding behaviour using camera-validated kinematic data and machine learning.

Jay Kirkham, Kimberley T A Davies, Heather J Foley, Chris Zadra, Rhyl Frith, Paolo S Segre, Sarah M E Fortune

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jay KirkhamDepartment of Oceanography, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2782-526X
Kimberley T A DaviesDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of New Brunswick, Saint John, NB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0645-7543
Heather J FoleyNortheast Fisheries Science Center, NOAA Fisheries, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0898-3008
Chris ZadraOcean Alliance, Gloucester, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2061-7126
Rhyl FrithDepartment of Oceanography, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2377-0645
Paolo S SegreDepartment of Natural and Applied Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Green Bay, Green Bay, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Sarah M E FortuneDepartment of Oceanography, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6505-9378

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whales are at risk from human activities and behavioural information can be important for informing risk policy. Underwater behaviour is increasingly being characterised with camera tags. Here, we characterise the kinematic signature of endangered North Atlantic right whales during feeding in high-risk areas. Customized Animal Tracking Solutions (CATS) tags were deployed (n = 23) to record the body position and movement of while simultaneously recording underwater video. Manual validation of tag camera footage was used to train classification learners, with a Support Vector Machine (SVM, 95% test accuracy) being the best performing. The SVM confirmed previously identified kinematic signatures important to identifying ram filtration. where decreased swim speed and increased fluke stroke occur due to increased drag from the opened mouth. Individual whales were predicted to spend 11-76% of their time actively filtering prey, averaging 11.4 hours day-1 feeding. Through video audit, we observed right whales feeding close to the seafloor during the day; our model also predicted previously unreported feeding close to the surface at night. This night feeding was underestimated by traditional feeding classification using dive shape relative to both audit (43.1%) and SVM-predicted feeding (54.9%). Based on pseudotracks, tagged whales collectively spent 74.6% of their time within a vessel exclusion zone. This research provides standardised techniques for classifying behaviour and also highlights potential gaps in policy-relevant information, such as elevated vessel strike risk at night.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorMachine LearningWhalesAnimalsAtlantic OceanBiomechanical PhenomenaSupport Vector MachineSwimmingVideo Recording

Identifiers

PMID42748089
PMCPMC13580984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.