ArticlePLOS digital health2026
DEPP: A diabetes exercise prescription protocol knowledge base.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Exercise plays a critical role in diabetes management by improving glycemic control and reducing cardiovascular risk. However, personalizing exercise prescriptions to individual characteristics and preferences is challenging, especially given the global shortage of exercise professionals, and current approaches often rely on general guidelines that lack support for individualized, evidence-based planning. To address this gap, we developed the Diabetes Exercise Prescription Protocol (DEPP) knowledge base, a structured evidence resource to assist healthcare experts in formulating personalized exercise prescriptions. DEPP was constructed by manually extracting and annotating data from 529 English-language studies retrieved from PubMed, resulting in a curated set of 766 exercise prescription protocols. The system uses a browser/server architecture implemented with Flask, SQLite, and Waitress. The knowledge base enables personalized retrieval and comparison of evidence-based protocols using a novel "FITT-VP-WC" framework, which extends the established FITT-VP principles by explicitly integrating warnings and contraindications as core safety components. Usability and clinical utility were evaluated with 12 sports physicians and 16 students (SUS/NPS) and in a vignette-based comparison with 20 clinicians (DEPP vs. no tool). The overall SUS score was 80.18 (physicians: 83.13, students: 77.97, p > 0.05) and NPS was 28.6% (physicians: 50.0%, students: 12.5%, p > 0.05), indicating good acceptance. In the comparative study, DEPP-assisted prescriptions significantly outperformed those without the tool across three standardized patient cases (all p < 0.001), confirming its practical benefit. The knowledge base is freely accessible at http://depp.sysbio.org.cn. This resource offers a new tool for evidence-based, personalized exercise prescription in diabetes care with positive user feedback.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.