Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42748077›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Incorporating public values into public health communications: Effects of value affirmations on intentions to vaccinate and trust in the U.S.

Christopher Wolsko, Elizabeth Marino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christopher WolskoDepartment of Psychology, Oregon State University - Cascades, Bend, Oregon, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6412-7310
Elizabeth MarinoDepartment of Anthropology, Oregon State University - Cascades, Bend, Oregon, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A set of COVID-19 pro-vaccine messages that aligned with key social values of vaccine-hesitant individuals was developed. In Spring of 2021, unvaccinated adults in the U.S. (n = 1,170) completed an online survey in which they were randomly assigned to read through one of several different pro-vaccine messages, followed by assessments of their future COVID-19 vaccine likelihood and level of trust in government, health care, and vaccines. Relative to a control condition, messages that affirmed individuals' distrust in the government and concerns over restrictions on personal liberty resulted in higher vaccination likelihood and greater trust. While the observed effect sizes of these messaging conditions were small, the findings have implications for broadening the value frames of public health appeals and understanding how and why vaccine hesitancy acts as a powerful way for people to express their values and authentic experiences.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHealth CommunicationPublic HealthSocial ValuesTrustVaccinationVaccination HesitancyAdultFemaleHumansIntentionMaleSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID42748077
PMCPMC13580949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.