Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42748070›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Tracing settlement dynamics in Latium vetus: Explainable machine learning perspectives from the Bronze to the Early iron age.

Luca Alessandri

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Luca AlessandriGroningen Institute of Archaeology, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8231-8482

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the long-term drivers of settlement location requires disentangling ecological constraints from historically contingent choices. Here I apply a Random Forest machine-learning framework, coupled with explainable AI techniques, to investigate settlement dynamics in Latium vetus (central Italy) from the Early Bronze Age to the early Iron Age (c. 2100-725 BCE). Using 108 securely dated sites and a set of environmentally constrained pseudo-absence points, I model phase-specific patterns and evaluate predictor importance through both normalized split frequencies and SHAP values, capturing structural roles as well as the magnitude and direction of effects. The results reveal a coherent diachronic transformation in the environmental logic of settlement. Early phases are primarily structured by hydrological accessibility, whereas from MBA3 onwards topographic configuration and elevation progressively dominate, marking a shift towards morphologically distinctive and defensible locations. This transition culminates in highly canalised settlement signatures during the Final Bronze Age and RMCA phases, before the RMCAIII phase signals a landscape that is increasingly saturated, hierarchically organised and functionally diversified, despite overall political stability. While the reliance on pseudo-absences and uneven sample sizes constrain predictive robustness, the approach demonstrates the value of Random Forest and SHAP as exploratory tools to expose non-linear, threshold-like relationships and to formalise long-standing archaeological interpretations. The study shows how explainable machine learning can provide a quantitative backbone for reconstructing the emergence, consolidation and transformation of territorially structured landscapes in protohistoric central Italy.

Indexed as

ArchaeologyMachine LearningHistory, AncientHumansItalyPredictive Learning ModelsRandom Forest

Identifiers

PMID42748070
PMCPMC13580991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.