ArticlePloS one2026
Grow against the flow: The impact of off-season vegetable production in Cambodia.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vegetable production is strongly seasonal, creating income volatility for smallholder farmers and occasionally high prices for consumers. The ability to produce vegetables outside their regular growing season can enhance farmers' incomes and income stability, yet empirical evidence remains limited. This study evaluates the impact of training farmers in Cambodia on off-season production technologies for yardlong beans, tomatoes, and brassicas during the hot-dry and wet seasons. Using survey data collected from 172 intervention and 179 control farmers two and three years after the training began, average treatment effects were estimated by using propensity score matching and inverse probability weighting. Trained farmers adopted an average of 3-4 more off-season technologies than the control group (p < 0.01). Two years after the intervention began, the share of trained farmers producing yardlong beans increased by 12 percentage points in the hot-dry season (with average production gains exceeding 100 kg) and by 46 percentage points in the wet season (with an average increase of about 700 kg). Corresponding revenue gains were approximately USD 50 and USD 300 per farmer, respectively (p < 0.01). Three years after the intervention began, revenue gains were lower, but still significant. Positive effects on tomato and brassica production and income were observed in the wet season, but not in the hot-dry season. These findings underscore the potential of off-season vegetable production to enhance rural livelihoods and improve year-round vegetable availability. The results provide evidence for stakeholders in Cambodia and comparable lower-income countries in Southeast Asia seeking to scale up off-season vegetable programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.