Observational studyMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2026
Positional and Temporal Changes in Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure in Mechanically Ventilated Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Prospective Observational Study.
Observational study in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endotracheal tube cuff pressure may fluctuate during routine intensive care unit (ICU) care despite standard monitoring. We evaluated short-term cuff pressure changes after repositioning according to measurement time, patient position, sedation level, and body mass index. MATERIAL AND METHODS This prospective observational study included 103 mechanically ventilated adult ICU patients. Before repositioning, cuff pressure was adjusted to 20 to 30 cm H₂O when necessary, and the resulting value was recorded as T0. Patients were placed in the head-elevated supine, right lateral, or left lateral position. Cuff pressure was remeasured at 1 (T1) and 5 (T2) minutes after repositioning. Repeated measurements obtained during routine positioning cycles over a 2-day period were analyzed via mixed-effects models. RESULTS In total, 4944 cuff pressure measurements were analyzed. Cuff pressure significantly increased over time, from 27.67±2.27 cm H₂O at T0 to 28.11±2.89 cm H₂O at T1 and 28.29±3.23 cm H₂O at T2 (P<0.001); the absolute magnitude of change was small. No significant differences were detected among target positions (P>0.05). Higher Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) scores were independently associated with increased cuff pressure (ß=0.94 cm H2₂ per 1-point increase; P<0.001) and higher odds of out-of-range cuff pressure (odds ratio, 7.21; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Endotracheal tube cuff pressure showed statistically significant short-term changes after repositioning. Higher RASS scores were associated with greater cuff pressure variability and higher odds of out-of-range cuff pressure. Repeated cuff pressure reassessment after repositioning may be beneficial, particularly in patients with higher RASS scores or greater agitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.