Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42748056›Full record

Trial reportJMIR mental health2026

Virtual Reality-Assisted Therapy Compared to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Patients With Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia: Assessor-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

Mélissa Beaudoin, Stéphane Potvin, Sabrina Giguère, Charles-Édouard Giguère, Frederick Aardema, Amal Abdel-Baki, Luigi De Benedictis, Olivier Lipp, Pierre Lalonde, Emmanuel Stip and 3 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JMIR mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Mélissa BeaudoinDepartment of Psychiatry and Addictology, Université de Montréal, 2900, boul. Édouard-Montpetit, Montreal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada, 1 514-251-4000 ext 3925.ORCID 0000-0002-0169-8055
Stéphane PotvinDepartment of Psychiatry and Addictology, Université de Montréal, 2900, boul. Édouard-Montpetit, Montreal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada, 1 514-251-4000 ext 3925.ORCID 0000-0003-1624-378X
Sabrina GiguèreDepartment of Psychiatry and Addictology, Université de Montréal, 2900, boul. Édouard-Montpetit, Montreal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada, 1 514-251-4000 ext 3925.ORCID 0000-0003-1254-7217
Charles-Édouard GiguèreInstitut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8507-6412
Frederick AardemaDepartment of Psychiatry and Addictology, Université de Montréal, 2900, boul. Édouard-Montpetit, Montreal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada, 1 514-251-4000 ext 3925.ORCID 0000-0003-1589-7511
Amal Abdel-BakiInstitut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Luigi De BenedictisDepartment of Psychiatry and Addictology, Université de Montréal, 2900, boul. Édouard-Montpetit, Montreal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada, 1 514-251-4000 ext 3925.
Olivier LippDepartment of Psychiatry and Addictology, Université de Montréal, 2900, boul. Édouard-Montpetit, Montreal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada, 1 514-251-4000 ext 3925.ORCID 0009-0001-3235-8547
Pierre LalondeDepartment of Psychiatry and Addictology, Université de Montréal, 2900, boul. Édouard-Montpetit, Montreal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada, 1 514-251-4000 ext 3925.ORCID 0009-0004-0680-1359
Emmanuel StipDepartment of Psychiatry and Addictology, Université de Montréal, 2900, boul. Édouard-Montpetit, Montreal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada, 1 514-251-4000 ext 3925.ORCID 0000-0003-2859-2100
Alexandra FortierDepartment of Psychiatry and Addictology, Université de Montréal, 2900, boul. Édouard-Montpetit, Montreal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada, 1 514-251-4000 ext 3925.ORCID 0000-0003-2232-0163
Kingsada PhraxayavongInstitut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Alexandre DumaisDepartment of Psychiatry and Addictology, Université de Montréal, 2900, boul. Édouard-Montpetit, Montreal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada, 1 514-251-4000 ext 3925.ORCID 0000-0002-4480-0064

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH) are among the most disabling symptoms of schizophrenia and often persist despite treatment. Virtual reality-assisted therapies (VRTs) are a new generation of relational interventions for AVH, but comparative evidence against active interventions is currently lacking. Objective: This study aimed to assess whether VRT (9 sessions) is superior to a short course of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) targeting AVH (9 sessions) in reducing AVH in individuals with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Methods: In this assessor-blind, parallel-group randomized controlled trial conducted from 2019 to 2026 at an academic center in Montreal (Canada), adults with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and persistent AVH were either referred by their health care team or self-referred. A total of 136 participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to VRT or CBT, stratified by sex and clozapine use status. Both 9-session interventions targeted maladaptive beliefs and relationships with voices and were administered by trained psychotherapists. The predetermined primary outcome was the evolution of AVH severity over time, measured at baseline, post treatment, and 3 months post therapy using the auditory hallucination subscale of the Psychotic Symptoms Rating Scale. Secondary outcomes notably included the general psychotic symptomatology measured using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. Linear mixed-effects models were used to assess time-by-treatment interactions. Psychotherapy sessions and assessments were conducted primarily in person, with CBT being occasionally delivered via videoconferencing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: Participants had a mean age of 40.3 (SD 12.8) years, 63.2% (86/136) were male, and 56.6% (77/136) received clozapine. Intention-to-treat analyses (VRT, n=67; CBT, n=69) showed a significant time-by-treatment interaction favoring VRT ( Conclusions: VRT outperformed a targeted short course of CBT in reducing persistent AVH for up to 3 months after the intervention in a North American population with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Improvements were also seen in some secondary outcomes, such as general psychotic symptomatology, and those were similar for both interventions. Overall, these findings support the value of VRT as a personalized and clinically effective intervention.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyHallucinationsSchizophrenia, Treatment-ResistantVirtual Reality Exposure TherapyAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychotic DisordersSingle-Blind MethodTreatment Outcomedigital interventionspsychotherapiesrandomized controlled trialtreatment-resistant schizophreniavirtual reality–assisted psychotherapy

Identifiers

PMID42748056
PMCPMC13580698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.