ReviewPlant signaling & behavior2026
From invitation to eviction: How plants control arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis.
Review in Plant signaling & behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbiosis is often presented as a linear sequence of fungal recognition, root colonization, arbuscule formation, and nutrient exchange. This view underrepresents the repeated regulatory transitions through which plants influence symbiotic establishment, function, and persistence. Here, we propose a checkpoint framework organized around invitation, admission, accommodation, investment, maintenance, and termination and renewal. We examine how nutrient status, carbon availability, hormonal and immune signaling, systemic root-shoot communication, and environmental context regulate fungal recruitment, intracellular entry, interface construction, resource exchange, and arbuscule turnover. We distinguish strong mechanistic evidence from correlative observations and emphasize that gene expression, colonization abundance, or arbuscule degeneration alone do not demonstrate resource flux, performance-sensitive evaluation, partner-level sanction, or selective interface termination. Evidence is strongest for plant control of presymbiotic signaling, cellular accommodation, interface construction and resourcing, nutrient acquisition, and regulated arbuscule turnover. By contrast, direct performance-sensitive evaluation of individual fungal interfaces remains insufficiently demonstrated. AM fungi also providing regulatory inputs: fungal signals, secreted molecules, and small RNAs can modify host processes, while fungal physiology and extraradical networks influence nutrient acquisition and allocation. Plant control is therefore substantial but not absolute, operating through asymmetrical, reciprocal regulation across interface, whole-plant, and fungal-network scales. We conclude by outlining experiments that link fungal nutrient contribution, plant response or allocation, and subsequent fate at the same interface, with fungal fitness additionally required for claims of partner-level sanction. Such experiments provide tests for distinguishing developmental and physiological regulation from performance-sensitive interface maintenance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.