ArticleAge and ageing2026
Consumer and health professional reflections and feedback on the Help After Leaving hospiTal delirium rehabilitation programme.
Article in Age and ageing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDelirium in late life is associated with long-term adverse clinical outcomes. There is no standard rehabilitation pathway following hospitalisation for individuals who experienced delirium. Through co-production we have been developing Help After Leaving HospiTal (HALT), a multicomponent, tailored and scalable intervention designed to prevent cognitive decline in individuals without dementia following in-hospital delirium. This study aimed to gather feedback on the HALT programme's structure, content, resources and engagement strategies prior to pilot testing from individuals who have treated, cared for or experienced delirium.
methodsA descriptive qualitative study was undertaken with health professionals (n = 12) and consumers (n = 4). Five in-person workshops were held in August and September 2025. A semi-structured workshop guide was used to elicit participant reflections and feedback. Audio-recorded data were transcribed verbatim, coded using NVivo and analysed using thematic analysis.
resultsFive themes were generated: (i) personalisation and enhanced support; (ii) beyond involvement, supporting support persons is essential; (iii) be a trusted partner; (iv) overcoming barriers to optimise engagement and (v) comprehensive content and easy to read materials.
conclusionFeedback has been used to shape the HALT programme prior to pilot testing by increasing the flexibility of module delivery methods, incorporating information for support persons, ensuring strong linkages with hospitals and overcoming barriers to optimise engagement to ensure the programme meets the needs of its intended users. These insights may also be leveraged by others working on delirium rehabilitation programmes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.