ArticleBiologia futura2026
Environmental drivers of carabid beetle communities in a historical urban park: a case study from Rusovce, Slovakia.
Article in Biologia futura, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Urban green spaces, particularly historical parks, serve as important refuges for biodiversity in cities. However, the traits that allow species to persist in these areas remain underexplored. Carabids are widely recognised as sensitive bioindicators of environmental change and habitat quality. We studied carabid beetle communities in seven distinct habitats within a historical park in Rusovce (Bratislava, Slovakia) from March 2019 to April 2020 using pitfall traps, recording 756 individuals belonging to 54 species. The community was dominated by three large, flightless forest species: Abax parallelepipedus, Carabus ulrichii, and Carabus coriaceus. Strikingly, flightless species as a whole made up only 17% of species richness yet 80% of all individuals, suggesting that the park sustains populations of poorly dispersing, disturbance-sensitive carabids at unusually high densities for an urban setting. Redundancy analysis showed that microclimatic conditions (soil, surface, and air temperature) and vegetation structure (tree and herb layer cover and richness, stand age, and litter depth) were the principal drivers of community composition, whereas among management practices, only invasive plant species and trampling significantly reduced beetle diversity; mowing, tree cutting, and monoculture plantations had no measurable effect. Comparing these results with our parallel studies of harvestmen and spiders from the same park revealed that each taxon responds to a distinct combination of environmental drivers, underscoring the value of multi-taxon monitoring for urban biodiversity assessment. These findings identify concrete, low-cost management levers, such as controlling invasive plants and limiting trampling, that city park managers can use to protect ground-dwelling arthropod diversity as urbanisation intensifies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42747760What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.