ArticleChinese journal of integrative medicine2026
Complex Intervention Frameworks for Acupuncture: Recommendations from a Scoping Review.
Article in Chinese journal of integrative medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore phase structures and evaluation components of existing complex intervention frameworks and to propose recommendations for future acupuncture frameworks.
methodsSix databases and multiple sources of gray literature were searched. Literature on complex interventions, including guidelines, frameworks, models, methodological studies, consensus statements, policy documents, and web-based guidance, were included. A narrative synthesis was conducted to examine phase settings and inter-phase relationships. The included frameworks were further assessed for their applicability to acupuncture evaluation, and preliminary recommendations were developed.
resultsA total of 46 publications were included, identifying 21 eligible frameworks, which were further categorized into 14 framework series. The included frameworks were mainly characterized by 3 phases, including preparatory, intervention evaluation, and long-term evaluation. Two evaluation approaches were identified, clinical-effect-first and mechanistic-first. Two structural design logics, sequential linear and sequential iterative models, were observed. The most frequently addressed phase components were overall effect evaluation (n=10, 71.4%) and component evaluation (n=13, 92.9%), whereas long-term outcomes were rarely considered (n=3, 21.4%). Regarding applicability to acupuncture, 4 major aspects were identified: acupuncture theory integration, individualized treatment adjustment, long-term follow-up, and real-world heterogeneity.
conclusionsExisting frameworks vary substantially in phase structures and are not fully adapted to acupuncture. Potential considerations in future framework development include acupuncture theory and clinical experience, individualized intervention protocol, practitioner factors, acupuncture-specific outcomes, long-term follow-up and safety, and biomedical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42747757What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.