ArticleNeuroinformatics2026
Circle of Willis-Guided Localization for Simultaneous Detection and Classification of Large Vessel Occlusions in Brain CTA.
Article in Neuroinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large vessel occlusions (LVOs) are blockages in the brain's major arteries that can cause severe neurological damage. Rapid and accurate detection using computed tomography angiography (CTA) is critical for timely stroke treatment. Here, we present a fully automated approach that detects LVOs and classifies the affected vessel simultaneously. Our method incorporates a spatial prior by using Circle of Willis (CoW) segmentation as additional input, guiding the model to anatomically relevant regions. We evaluated the two strategies, the global approach using the full CTA volume, and the local one focused on CoW regions. Both achieved high performance. Detection sensitivity was 0.97 at 0.20 false positives per image for the global approach, and 0.97 at 0.13 false positives for the local approach. Classification accuracy reached 94% and 91% for global and local strategies, respectively. Importantly, the local approach was 3.3× faster, offering a computationally efficient solution, a critical advantage in acute stroke care, where every minute impacts patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.