ArticleAnatomical science international2026
Comparative integumentary fascial anatomy in mice, rats, and humans: homologies and implications for translational wound healing research.
Article in Anatomical science international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In mice, native fascia and surrounding tissues have been shown to mobilize into wounds during healing, particularly during the proliferative phase. However, comparative descriptions of integumentary fascial anatomy across commonly used research species remain limited. This study aimed to characterize and compare the fascial layers of the integumentary system in mice, rats, and humans, identify structural homologies across species, and discuss the implications of these findings for wound healing research. Histological analysis of skin specimens from mice, rats, and humans was performed using microscopy to identify epidermal, dermal, adipose, fascial, and muscular tissue planes. Gross anatomical dissections of human pannus specimens were additionally used to identify subcutaneous fascial compartments. Tissue layers were systematically identified, described, and compared across species. Mice demonstrated the most complex fascial architecture, comprising multiple distinct sublayers within the stratum fibrosum. Rats displayed a simpler, more homogeneous stratum fibrosum with a comparatively greater tissue thickness between fascial planes and the overlying dermis. In humans, the subcutaneous space was involving the superficial (Camper's fascia), centered Scarpa's fascia, and Deep adipose layer were exposed for comparison. Cross-species homologies were identified within the integumentary and fascial layers. Integumentary fascia demonstrates both conservation and important species-specific structural divergence. The distinctive multi-layered fascial organization and shallow fascial depth in mice may facilitate unique wound-healing dynamics that are not fully replicated in rats or humans. These anatomical differences should be carefully considered and experimentally tested prior to extrapolating murine fascia-related wound-healing mechanisms onto rats and humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42747722What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.