ReviewCurrent obesity reports2026
Obesity-Associated Osteoarthritis: Mechanical-Metabolic Pathogenesis, Obesity Memory and Dual-Target Therapy.
Review in Current obesity reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewGiven the global obesity epidemic, osteoarthritis (OA) incidence is expected to rise, posing a substantial public health burden. This review covers epidemiological associations of obesity and OA, controversial mechanisms, and current prevention and treatment limitations. Based on these insights, we propose a dual‑target treatment strategy for obesity‑induced OA. RECENT
findingsLeptin signaling and mechanical overload from excess adiposity independently drive OA pathogenesis, whereas obesity‑related adipose dysfunction exerts its pathogenic effects only in the presence of mechanical loading. Obesity‑induced residual memory may persist and sustain joint damage even after weight loss and metabolic improvement. Evidence‑based weight loss strategies should be implemented to prevent OA, with the preventive window for obesity shifting to infancy. Given the limited and controversial structural benefits of current clinical interventions, a dual‑target strategy combining weight loss with memory‑targeted interventions is warranted. This review provides new insights into the debate on mechanical versus metabolic mechanisms in obesity‑induced OA, clarifying their relative contributions. Earlier obesity prevention interventions offer a broader window for OA prevention. Given these limitations, a dual‑target strategy addressing both excessive fat accumulation and its persistent adverse effects may represent a promising clinical direction, with particular potential for repurposing FDA‑approved agents such as semaglutide and metformin in this context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42747716What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.