Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42747708›Full record

ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2026

Effects of In Ovo Probiotic Injection and Dietary Supplementation on Growth Performance, Antioxidant Status, and Selected Culturable Intestinal Microorganisms in Broilers.

Mehmet Reşit Karageçi̇li̇, Sezen Tayam, Muhammed Fatih Ceyhan, Rabia Mehtap Tuncay

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mehmet Reşit Karageçi̇li̇Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Animal Science, Van Yüzüncü Yıl University, Van, 65080, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8433-0397
Sezen TayamFaculty of Applied Sciences, Department of Animal Production and Technologies, Muş Alparslan University, Muş, 49250, Türkiye. s.tayam@alparslan.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1693-0651
Muhammed Fatih CeyhanFaculty of Agriculture, Department of Animal Science, Van Yüzüncü Yıl University, Van, 65080, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-1951-4487
Rabia Mehtap TuncayFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Food Hygiene and Technology, Van Yüzüncü Yıl University, Van, 65080, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3510-5369

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study investigated the effects of in ovo (IO) probiotic injection and dietary probiotic supplementation on growth performance, antioxidant status, and selected culturable intestinal microorganisms in broilers. A total of 540 fertile Ross 308 eggs were allocated to a 2 × 3 factorial arrangement consisting of two in ovo treatments (no injection or probiotic injection) and three dietary probiotic supplementation levels (0, 5, or 10 mL/kg feed). After hatching, 504 chicks were assigned to six treatment groups with four replicate pens per treatment. The control group received no IO injection and was fed a commercial diet. Birds in the Control+P5 and Control+P10 groups received no IO injection and were fed diets supplemented with 5 and 10 ml/kg probiotic, respectively. The remaining treatment groups received IO injection and were subsequently fed diets containing 0, 5, and 10 ml/kg probiotic supplementation. The in ovo application was performed on day 18 of incubation at a dose of 50 µl/egg. No significant interaction between in ovo treatment and dietary probiotic supplementation was observed for growth performance variables. In ovo probiotic application did not affect body weight, feed intake, or feed conversion ratio throughout the experimental period. However, dietary probiotic supplementation negatively affected body weight from the second week onward and adversely affected feed intake during days 8-14, 15-21, and 22-28. Although in ovo probiotic application increased total antioxidant capacity in liver tissue, it reduced the concentrations of vitamin E, retinol, and carotenoids at Day 42. IO probiotic injection increased Bacillus subtilis counts, whereas it decreased Lactobacillus spp. and Saccharomyces cerevisiae counts in intestinal contents. Only high level dietary probiotic supplementation increased Bacillus subtilis counts while decreased Lactobacillus spp counts. In conclusion, in ovo probiotic administration primarily affected hepatic antioxidant status and selected culturable intestinal microorganisms, whereas continuous dietary supplementation at the tested doses adversely affected growth performance.

Indexed as

AntioxidantBroilerIn ovo (IO)Intestinal microorganismsProbiotic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.