ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2026
Quantitative stability of MGMT promoter methylation in recurrent glioma and implications for temozolomide rechallenge.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeO^6^-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation is a key predictive biomarker for temozolomide (TMZ) response in glioma. MGMT status is routinely assessed at diagnosis; however, its utility at recurrence remains incompletely characterized. We aimed to quantify MGMT methylation stability and assess the clinical relevance of reported status changes in recurrent glioma.
methodsWe analyzed paired tumor samples from 426 patients with recurrent glioma in a large commercial molecular database containing quantitative methylation percentage and binary methylation status at two sample time points. A separate multi-institutional clinical cohort (n = 27) with detailed treatment annotation was analyzed to explore associations between MGMT status at recurrence and treatment decision-making. Statistical analyses assessed quantitative methylation dynamics and time between samples as a surrogate for disease course.
resultsMGMT status remained unchanged in 84% of tumors across recurrence. 16% demonstrated a status change, commonly among tumors with low baseline methylation near classification thresholds. Longitudinal quantitative methylation changes were modest overall. Tumors that remained, gained, or lost hypermethylation demonstrated longer intervals between samples compared to consistently unmethylated tumors (p < 0.01). In the clinical cohort, TMZ rechallenge was more frequently pursued in patients retaining hypermethylation at recurrence.
conclusionMGMT promoter methylation is quantitatively stable in the majority of recurrent gliomas. Status changes predominantly occur in tumors with borderline methylation, highlighting the limitations of binary classification. These findings support routine reassessment of MGMT at recurrence and underscore the value of quantitative reporting to better inform therapeutic decision-making, particularly regarding TMZ rechallenge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.