ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2026
Large Evoked Responses and Synchronisation Recorded over the Cerebellum in Human Subjects in Response to Postural Perturbations.
Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study we recorded EEG changes over the cerebellum and leg muscle EMG in response to externally applied, stereotyped postural perturbations during standing. Ten healthy adults underwent mechanical perturbations delivered at the shoulders, applied by a torque motor. There was a standing force of 1.17 N and maximum additional force of 18.8 N. Five intermingled conditions were used: four consisted of backwards pulls (75-465 ms duration) and one a "let go" condition (200 ms). EEG was recorded using a cerebellar-extended montage with detailed analyses at the midline Iz electrode. Lower limb EMG (tibialis anterior and soleus) and accelerometry were collected concurrently. Posterior perturbations consistently evoked early postural EMG responses with inhibition of soleus and excitation in tibialis anterior (mean latency 90.2-94.2 ms). Associated with this was a prominent early biphasic cerebellar potential at Iz (P80-N100; mean amplitude approximately 40 µV peak to peak). The properties of this response - its positive onset, location and amplitude - are consistent with Purkinje neuron discharge. RMS averages for EEG activity above 30 Hz revealed patterns localised to the posterior fossa. Responses at Iz consisted of multiple bursts of excitation and inhibition followed by inhibition when the longer perturbations reduced. Single-trial analyses revealed biphasic potentials with short inter-peak intervals (~ 5 ms) synchronised to the excitatory bursts. We conclude that postural perturbations evoke a short latency potential over the cerebellum, likely to represent Purkinje neuron discharge due to climbing fibre input, in turn followed by synchronisation and further facilitation. Our findings support the view that synchronised climbing fibre activity occurs in response to significant sensory events and may facilitate compensatory motor responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.