ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2026
Evaluating Partnership Quality and Outcomes Within an Autism Community Collaborative.
Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeParticipatory approaches are increasingly emphasized in autism research, yet evaluations of partnership processes and outcomes remain limited. The present study sought to evaluate partnership processes and outcomes within an autism community collaborative that spanned three years. Study aims were to evaluate to what extent members rated their participation in a community collaborative as reflective of principles of partnership and engagement as well as member perceptions of engagement and partnership.
methodsParticipants (n = 20) completed survey items assessing synergy, decision-making, and satisfaction with engagement in the collaborative; sixteen participants completed semi-structured interviews. Qualitative data were analyzed using rapid qualitative and inductive content analysis.
resultsSurvey ratings reflected high partner engagement and satisfaction. Qualitative results generally aligned with survey results while revealing how partnership processes contributed to these outcomes. Themes related to the experience of establishing shared values, relational communication, diversity of perspectives within the collaborative, drivers of experience, and community engagement.
conclusionThe present work provides further evidence on how relational processes, shared values, and inclusive communication shape partnership outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42747660What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.