ArticleTropical animal health and production2026
Morphometric and reproductive characterization of four autochthonous chicken ecotypes in Ethiopia.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A study was conducted to characterize four autochthonous chicken ecotypes of Ethiopia using selected phenotypic traits. Data were collected from a total of 191 chickens, including reproductive traits such as age at first egg, first egg weight, egg number at 250 days, egg weight at 250 days, hatchability and fertility. Morphometric measurements were recorded at 24 weeks of age from 40 cocks and 151 hens, including body weight and linear body dimensions. Both univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were performed using SAS software. The results revealed moderate variation among ecotypes, with significant differences observed in age at first egg, first egg weight, and egg number at 250 days. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was used to identify key traits contributing to variation. In female chickens, the first two principal components (PC1 and PC2) explained 76.13% of the total variation, while in males, the first three principal components (PC1, PC2, and PC3) accounted for 72.14% of the total variation. Key discriminating traits in males included shank length, shank circumference, neck length, wattle width, and wing span, whereas in females, shank length, beak length, wattle length, keel length, and wing span were the most important distinguishing features. In conclusion, the observed phenotypic variability indicates the potential for selection and genetic improvement of indigenous chicken ecotypes. However, integrating molecular characterization is recommended to validate morphological differences and enhance breeding programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42747636What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.