Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42747588›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2026

What are the Unmet Needs in Managing Digestive Neuroendocrine Carcinomas?

Halfdan Sorbye, Mairéad G McNamara, Margot Et Tesselaar, Mauro Cives, Stian Knappskog, Aurel Perren, Jonathan Strosberg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Halfdan SorbyeCancer Clinic, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway. halfdan.sorbye@helse-bergen.no.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7132-6214
Mairéad G McNamaraDivision of Cancer Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, University of Manchester, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Margot Et TesselaarDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mauro CivesInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
Stian KnappskogCancer Clinic, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Aurel PerrenInstitute of Tissue Medicine and Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Jonathan StrosbergDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review highlights the major unmet needs in diagnosis and treatment of digestive neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) and describes the current and evolving evidence on these aspects. RECENT

findingsImproved pathological criteria are needed to accurately diagnose NEC and distinguish this entity from high-grade well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours as well as from adenocarcinoma. Studies on the molecular mechanisms underlying the extreme aggressiveness of the disease are ongoing. Data are lacking on optimal selection of patients with locoregional disease for primary tumour surgery and use of adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment. For patients with metastatic disease, there has been no improvement in systemic treatment over the last two decades and immunotherapy has limited benefit. Novel antigen-directed strategies targeting DLL3 are evolving. Digestive NEC are among the most aggressive cancers and prognosis remains poor. There have been only minor improvements over the last two decades. To improve diagnosis and therapy, the unmet needs discussed in this review must be addressed.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, NeuroendocrineDigestive System NeoplasmsHumansPrognosisDiagnosisDigestiveNeuroendocrine carcinomaTreatment

Identifiers

PMID42747588
PMCPMC13582160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.