ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2026
Structure-guided identification of histone deacetylase 11 inhibitors for targeted chemotherapy through long-timescale molecular dynamics simulation.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextHistone deacetylase 11 (HDAC11), the sole member of class IV histone deacetylases, is an emerging epigenetic target in cancer therapy. In this study, an integrated computational approach involving ADMET screening, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics simulations was employed to identify potential HDAC11 inhibitors from 35 known HDAC inhibitors. Based on combined docking and pharmacokinetic analyses, five compounds were shortlisted for detailed evaluation. Mocetinostat exhibited the highest binding affinity toward HDAC11 (-8.70 kcal/mol) with acceptable pharmacokinetic properties (LogP: 2.25; TPSA: 99.11 Å
methodsThe HDAC11 protein structure was prepared and optimized along with ligand structures prior to docking. Pharmacokinetic properties and drug-likeness of all 35 selected HDAC inhibitors were predicted using the SwissADME web server, and toxicity profiles were assessed using the Protox-II server. Molecular docking was performed using PyRx with the AutoDock Vina scoring function. Protein-ligand interactions were analyzed using PyMOL and Discovery Studio visualizers. Molecular dynamics simulations were conducted using GROMACS with the CHARMM27 force field and TIP3P water model. A total of 3.5 µs of molecular dynamics simulations were performed, including a 500 ns production run and triplicate 100 ns validation runs for each complex. MD trajectory analyses, including RMSD, RMSF, radius of gyration, solvent-accessible surface area, hydrogen bond analysis, and kernel density estimation, were used to evaluate structural stability and interaction dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42747587What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.