Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42747587›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2026

Structure-guided identification of histone deacetylase 11 inhibitors for targeted chemotherapy through long-timescale molecular dynamics simulation.

Koustav Maiti, Deotima Chakraborty, Chandra Sekar Ponnusamy, Heshine Gnanasekar, Nevedha Ravindran, Bhavani Sridharan, Mahesh Velusamy

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Koustav MaitiDepartment of Human Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Central University of Punjab, Bathinda, 151401, Punjab, India.
Deotima ChakrabortyDepartment of Bioinformatics, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad University of Technology, Haringhata, 700064, West Bengal, India.
Chandra Sekar PonnusamySchool of Applied Biosciences, Food, and Agri Tech, Rathinam Global Deemed to Be University, Coimbatore, 641021, Tamil Nadu, India. chandrasekar1990@gmail.com.
Heshine GnanasekarZentrum Für Bioinformatik, Universität Des Saarlandes, 66125, Saarbrücken, Saarland, Germany.
Nevedha RavindranDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55108, USA.
Bhavani SridharanNyBerMan Bioinformatics Europe, Paddenstoelenlaan 8, 3451 PZ, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Mahesh VelusamyNyBerMan Bioinformatics Europe, Paddenstoelenlaan 8, 3451 PZ, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextHistone deacetylase 11 (HDAC11), the sole member of class IV histone deacetylases, is an emerging epigenetic target in cancer therapy. In this study, an integrated computational approach involving ADMET screening, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics simulations was employed to identify potential HDAC11 inhibitors from 35 known HDAC inhibitors. Based on combined docking and pharmacokinetic analyses, five compounds were shortlisted for detailed evaluation. Mocetinostat exhibited the highest binding affinity toward HDAC11 (-8.70 kcal/mol) with acceptable pharmacokinetic properties (LogP: 2.25; TPSA: 99.11 Å

methodsThe HDAC11 protein structure was prepared and optimized along with ligand structures prior to docking. Pharmacokinetic properties and drug-likeness of all 35 selected HDAC inhibitors were predicted using the SwissADME web server, and toxicity profiles were assessed using the Protox-II server. Molecular docking was performed using PyRx with the AutoDock Vina scoring function. Protein-ligand interactions were analyzed using PyMOL and Discovery Studio visualizers. Molecular dynamics simulations were conducted using GROMACS with the CHARMM27 force field and TIP3P water model. A total of 3.5 µs of molecular dynamics simulations were performed, including a 500 ns production run and triplicate 100 ns validation runs for each complex. MD trajectory analyses, including RMSD, RMSF, radius of gyration, solvent-accessible surface area, hydrogen bond analysis, and kernel density estimation, were used to evaluate structural stability and interaction dynamics.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHistone DeacetylasesMolecular Dynamics SimulationHumansHydrogen BondingHydroxamic AcidsLigandsMolecular Docking SimulationProtein BindingAntineoplastic AgentsHDAC11 protein, humanHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHistone DeacetylasesHydroxamic AcidsLigandsCancer chemotherapyHDAC11Molecular dockingMolecular dynamics simulationPharmacokinetics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.