ReviewMolecular biology reports2026
Collateral sensitivity-harnessing microbial vulnerabilities as a solution to antimicrobial resistance.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacteria exhibit an evolutionary trade-off through their development of collateral sensitivity (CS) which allows them to resist one antibiotic while becoming more vulnerable to another. This vulnerability offers a compelling therapeutic opportunity by selecting against resistant isolates. Laboratory evolution studies, genome sequencing, deep mutagenesis and use of artificial intelligence and machine learning can design the bespoke strategy against multi-drug-resistant bacteria. This review discusses about recent studies that are rationally designed to harness this evolutionary trade-off for the development of alternative antimicrobial strategies. The translational barriers to the clinical implementation of CS are addressed and evidence-based design principles for optimization of CS-guided therapy are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42747582What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.