Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42747552›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of legal medicine2026

Atomic force microscopy in human post-mortem samples: current applications and future directions.

Fabio De-Giorgio, Beatrice Benedetti

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fabio De-GiorgioFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy. fabiodegiorgio3@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7433-0924
Beatrice BenedettiNational Institute for Insurance against Accidents at Work (INAIL), Macerata, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanotechnologies are increasingly being explored in forensic science, including Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM), a scanning probe technique capable of high-resolution surface analysis and quantitative nano-mechanical assessment. AFM can be applied to both inert materials and biological specimens; this narrative review focuses on human post-mortem samples. We aimed to summarize current AFM applications in this setting and to outline realistic directions for future research. A structured search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science identified five studies consistent with our predefined focus. The available evidence addressed mainly bone, skeletal muscle, tendinous tissue, and hair. Bone studies investigated local mechanical properties relevant to fracture susceptibility, supporting the rationale for extending AFM to forensic scenarios such as the differentiation between perimortem trauma and post-mortem damage and the assessment of thermally altered remains. Studies on skeletal muscle and iliotibial band highlighted the influence of tissue water content on mechanical parameters, with implications for experimental designs targeting Post Mortem Interval. Hair analyses were primarily conducted on mummified remains, reporting structural differences between contemporary samples and mummified hair. These findings support further research adopting a comparative framework across different historical periods and site-specific environmental conditions. Overall, AFM appears promising for the characterization of post-mortem tissues, including substrates that remain underexplored in forensic research-such as skin, which has already been widely investigated in clinical settings. However, the current evidence base is constrained by small sample sizes, high costs, and substantial methodological heterogeneity. Future studies should therefore prioritize standardized protocols and multicentre designs to strengthen forensic applicability.

Indexed as

Atomic force microscopyBoneForensic pathologyHairMusclePost mortem interval

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.