ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026
From virtual screening to cell-based assays: structure-guided identification of EGFR-targeting perimidine derivatives with anticancer activity.
Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer remains a significant health issue based on its increasing incidence, multidrug resistance, and associated increased mortality rate. The overexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been significantly correlated with the pathogenesis and aggressiveness of various subtypes of breast cancer. In this study, we explored a series of perimidine-derived small molecules as potential EGFR-targeting candidates using a structure-guided approach. A virtual library of 201 derivatives of perimidine was built and screened by molecular docking against four EGFR isoforms (PDB IDs: 4HJO, 1M17, 4I23, and 5UGB) with the Schrödinger Suite. Out of these, two lead candidates, Compound 101 and Compound 201, exhibited better binding affinity and good interaction profiles. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were also carried out to determine the conformational stability of the lead compounds at the EGFR binding site, compared with their respective co-crystallized standards. Compound 201 consistently ranked among the top predicted binders across all four target structures (4HJO, 1M17, 4I23, 5UGB), and cross-target rank correlation analysis supported target-consistent binding behavior for selected compounds. ADMET profiling by Swiss ADME and ADMETlab 3.0 indicated good pharmacokinetic and toxicity parameters evidencing their drug-likeness along with some pharmacokinetic parameters which warrant further optimization. The chosen compounds were synthesized and structurally elucidated, and theoretical validation was established by DFT analysis. Following in vitro cytotoxicity evaluation by MTT assay on MCF-7 breast cancer cells along with an EGFR-relevant triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cell line, differential and considerable cytotoxicity was found. Overall, these results indicate that perimidine-based molecules, particularly Compound 101 and Compound 201, are promising compounds towards the development as EGFR-targeting anticancer drugs; however, further biochemical and cellular target-validation studies are required to confirm direct EGFR inhibition and their therapeutic potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42747545What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.