Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42747527›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

A randomized trial of nefopam for postoperative pain management in obstructive sleep apnea patients undergoing uvulopalatopharyngoplasty.

Saowapark Chumpathong, Peerachatra Mangmeesri, Sriwimon Panyamee, Wish Banhiran, Maythad Uataya

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Saowapark ChumpathongDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-2594-2328
Peerachatra MangmeesriDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. peerachatra.man@mahidol.ac.th.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2858-5974
Sriwimon PanyameeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Wish BanhiranDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4029-6657
Maythad UatayaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-5917-2470

Funding

Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University R016432020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveUvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) is a surgical treatment for obstructive sleep apnea that often results in significant postoperative pain. Given the risks associated with opioid use in patients with obstructive sleep apnea, multimodal analgesia is preferred. This study evaluated whether nefopam, a non-opioid analgesic, without respiratory depressive effects, could reduce morphine consumption and improve postoperative recovery in patients undergoing UPPP.

methodsThis prospective, exploratory, randomized, triple-blinded trial enrolled patients scheduled for elective UPPP. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either nefopam or a placebo (normal saline). The nefopam group received a 20 mg intravenous loading dose over 1 h, followed by a continuous infusion of 80 mg over 24 h. Both groups received standard multimodal analgesia. The primary outcome was total morphine consumption within 24 h postoperatively. The secondary outcomes were postoperative pain scores, time to first oral intake, patient satisfaction, quality-of-life scores, and adverse events.

resultsFifty-one patients were analyzed (nefopam: 26, control: 25). The median 24-hour morphine consumption was 7 mg in the nefopam group and 5 mg in the control group (P = 0.56). No significant differences were found between groups in postoperative pain scores, time to first oral intake, patient satisfaction, or quality-of-life scores. Adverse event rates were similar, although tachycardia (11.5%) and sweating (3.8%) were observed only in the nefopam group. Subgroup analysis in UPPP alone and extended UPPP surgery likewise revealed no significant differences between groups.

conclusionNefopam is not recommended for pain management following UPPP as it did not significantly reduce morphine consumption or improve pain-related outcomes.

Indexed as

Multimodal analgesiaNefopamObstructive sleep apneaPostoperative painUvulopalatopharyngoplasty

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.