Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42747524›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Impedance-based tracking of a cochlear implant electrode reliably detects successful array insertion.

Tabita Breitsprecher, Stefan Hans, Aline Föger, Angelika Dierker, Joachim Schmutzhard, Stefan Dazert, Nora M Weiss

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tabita BreitsprecherUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Stefan HansMED-EL, Elektromedizinische Geräte Deutschland GmbH, Starnberg, Germany.
Aline FögerMED-EL, Elektromedizinische Geräte GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria.
Angelika DierkerMED-EL, Elektromedizinische Geräte GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria.
Joachim SchmutzhardDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria.
Stefan DazertDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, St. Elisabeth-Hospital Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Nora M WeissDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, St. Elisabeth-Hospital Bochum, Bochum, Germany. nora.weiss@mri.tum.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionContinuous impedance measurements during cochlear implantation have been hypothesized to provide a reliable indication if the electrode is inside or outside the cochlea. Therefore they provide a valuable feedback mechanism for successful insertion to the surgeon. This study aims to investigate whether impedances can be used to reliably detect successful insertion of the cochlear -implant electrode array.

methodsIn a prospective cross-sectional single-center study patients undergoing cochlear implantation with flexible lateral wall arrays (MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria) were recruited between June 2022 and May 2023. Continuous impedance telemetry during electrode array insertion was obtained and compared to the ground truth of visual and audiological feedback by the surgeon.

results34 patients (23 women, 11 men;, 16 left ears, 18 right ears) with a mean age of 52.8 years (SD 19.6 years) were included. The present study found a reliability of 88.9% comparing the algorithm of continuous insertion to the ground truth.

conclusionsContinuous impedance measurements show a high reliability to detect the insertion of electrode contacts of a cochlear implant electrode array. The data collected by the software are suitable to detect misplacements already during insertion. This method is a promising approach to intraoperatively monitor successful insertion and offers the opportunity to replace fluoroscopy and radiological imaging in the aftercare of cochlear implant surgery.

Indexed as

Anatomy-based fittingFeedback mechanismImpedance telemetryInsertion monitoring

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.