Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42747515›Full record

ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2026

From innovation to integration: what German mental health professionals think about peer-led youth discovery colleges.

Jared Omundo, Simon Alexander Stiehl, Manuel Föcker, Michael Schulz, Shiblu Miah, Michael Löhr, Gianfranco Zuaboni, Luna-Brigitte Stitz, Klaus-Thomas Kronmüller, Orkan Okan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jared OmundoTUM School of Medicine and Health Department of Health and Sport Sciences, Professorship of Health Literacy, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. jared.omundo@tum.de.
Simon Alexander StiehlMedizinische Fakultät, Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane, Fehrbelliner Straße 38, 16816, Neuruppin, Germany.
Manuel FöckerLWL-Universitätsklinik Hamm, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Campus Gütersloh, Ruhr-University Bochum, Hamm, Germany.
Michael SchulzRecovery College Gütersloh (RC GT-OWL), Gütersloh Haus 55, Buxelstraße 50, 33334, Gütersloh, Germany.
Shiblu MiahLead Practitioner; RECOIL - Flourish in Education, Recovery and Discovery Colleges (NHS), Luton, United Kingdom.
Michael LöhrRecovery College Gütersloh (RC GT-OWL), Gütersloh Haus 55, Buxelstraße 50, 33334, Gütersloh, Germany.
Gianfranco ZuaboniRecovery College Bern (RCB), Kornhaus Bern, Kornhausplatz 18, Bern, 3011, Switzerland.
Luna-Brigitte StitzCloser2Fine Mental Health Consulting, Duisburg, Germany.
Klaus-Thomas KronmüllerRecovery College Gütersloh (RC GT-OWL), Gütersloh Haus 55, Buxelstraße 50, 33334, Gütersloh, Germany.
Orkan OkanTUM School of Medicine and Health Department of Health and Sport Sciences, Professorship of Health Literacy, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mental health challenges among children and adolescents are increasing in Germany, highlighting the need for innovative, recovery-oriented approaches that complement existing mental health services. Discovery Colleges (DCs), a youth adaptation of the Recovery College model, are co-produced educational programmes that promote mental health literacy, empowerment, and collaborative learning through partnerships between professionals and individuals with lived experience. Although Discovery Colleges have been established internationally, little is known about their implementation potential within the German child and adolescent mental health system. This study therefore explored German mental health professionals' awareness, perceptions, and support for implementing the Discovery College model. A convergent mixed-methods cross-sectional online survey was conducted among mental health professionals working with children and adolescents in Germany. The study included 133 mental health professionals. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics, while qualitative responses to voluntary open-ended questions were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Findings were integrated to examine convergence, complementarity, and qualification across the quantitative and qualitative components. Only 24.1% of participants reported prior familiarity with Discovery Colleges. Following a standardised description of the model, 70.0% expressed support for establishing a Discovery College locally. Participants rated the model as highly relevant (M = 4.79, SD = 1.21), whereas the perceived likelihood of implementation was more cautious (M = 2.95, SD = 0.98). Perceived relevance significantly predicted implementation support (r = .353, p < .001). Qualitative findings contextualised these favourable evaluations by highlighting early support, empowerment, lived experience, and collaborative learning, and converged with quantitative findings regarding mental health literacy. They also qualified implementation support by identifying organisational integration, safeguarding, quality, and equitable access as important implementation conditions. Despite limited prior awareness, German mental health professionals generally perceived Discovery Colleges as relevant and supported their implementation. These findings support further context-sensitive pilot implementation and evaluation, with attention to professional awareness, cross-sector collaboration, safeguarding, equitable access, and organisational integration.

Indexed as

Children and AdolescentsDiscovery CollegesGermanyMental Health LiteracyMental Health ProfessionalsRecovery CollegesRecovery-oriented Approach

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.