ArticlePediatric cardiology2026
Bench Testing of Multiple Valve-in-Valves Within a Large Housing Self-Expanding Pulmonary Valve.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lifetime management of patients with large dysfunctional right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) should incorporate a predefined strategy for valve-in-valve (ViV) treatment. The choice of the initial self-expanding platform may determine the feasibility, equipment and interventional techniques required for subsequent ViV procedures. This study was performed to demonstrate bench-test feasibility of multiple ViV within a large self-expanding pulmonary platform, the VenusP-valve (Venus Medtech). Bench testing was performed using a modular, human-grade anatomical right heart simulator (SimuPULS Pulmonary platform, Simulands). Continuous real-time monitoring was performed using biplane angiographic system and four synchronized cameras. Sequential ViV implantation was performed using progressively smaller VenusP-valves (34 mm, 32 mm, 30 mm) deployed within the initial 36 mm VenusP-valve. Subsequently, a 29 mm balloon-expandable valve (Vitae, Venus Medtech) was implanted within the multi-layered self-expanding valves. Fluoroscopic measurements of the self-expanding valve frame demonstrated minimal under expansion (~ 2 mm) of the tubular section. Final measurements confirmed appropriate expansion of the balloon-expandable valve within the complex of four previously implanted self-expanding valves. The external diameters of the tubular section at peak balloon inflation and after balloon deflation demonstrated minimal recoil (< 1 mm). Final external diameters did not exceed the nominal diameter of the initial 36 mm valve. Valve-in-valve implantation within a large-frame self-expanding valve, enables sequential implantation of progressively smaller self-expanding valves whilst still preserving the option for subsequent implantation of a large balloon-expandable valve. These bench findings may support clinical decision making and ViV planning for percutaneous lifetime management of patients with dysfunctional RVOT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42747493What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.