ArticleDysphagia2026
Nicergoline for Neuromuscular Oropharyngeal Dysphagia: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Randomized Trial.
Article in Dysphagia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neuromuscular oropharyngeal dysphagia impairs the coordinated neurologic and muscular mechanisms of deglutition, predisposing patients to aspiration pneumonia, malnutrition, and diminished quality of life. Substance P participates in the swallow reflex; nicergoline, an ergot derivative, increases substance P concentrations, yet its therapeutic effect on dysphagia remains uncertain. We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to determine whether nicergoline improves swallow function, quantified by the visual analog scale and flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. Forty-four patients with neuromuscular oropharyngeal dysphagia were randomized to receive nicergoline 30 mg daily (n = 21) or matched placebo (n = 23) for 4 weeks. Baseline and week-4 visual analog scale scores, flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing scores, and penetration-aspiration scale ratings were compared within and between groups. Thirty-eight participants completed the study (nicergoline n = 19; placebo n = 19). Changes in visual analog scale and flexible endoscopic evaluation scores did not differ significantly between groups. However, nicergoline produced a statistically significant reduction in penetration-aspiration scale score, indicating enhanced airway protection during swallowing. These data suggest that nicergoline augments swallow safety in neuromuscular oropharyngeal dysphagia and may offer a therapeutic option for its management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42747485What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.