ArticleBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2026
[Digital assistive systems to support everyday functioning: first experiences with telepresence robotics in home-based stroke care].
Article in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDigital assistive systems can support everyday functioning of people needing help by providing information, supporting therapeutic processes and enabling communication and social participation. Telepresence robotics (TPR) comprises physically embodied, mobile systems that can be used in domestic environments. So far, the technology has not yet been widely implemented in healthcare practice. This study aimed to examine the expectations, experiences and acceptance of TPR among individuals with stroke, their relatives and healthcare staff.
methodsBefore (t1) and after (t2) a 24-week trial phase involving two TPR devices (field phase 2021-2023), patients and relatives were surveyed using a standardised questionnaire (t1: 48 and 53 respectively; t2: 39 and 50). A cross-sectional survey involved 31 healthcare professionals. The data were analysed using descriptive and bivariate statistics. Additionally, personal interviews with patients and relatives were analysed using structuring qualitative content analysis according to Mayring.
resultsThe initially high expectations associated with TPR regarding independence, safety, communication and relief for relatives in everyday life were often not met. None of the systems were considered a convincing aid for everyday life. Autonomous mobility and voice assistance proved to be of limited help. The simple and flexible tablet solution was preferred over TPR. DISCUSSION: While telepresence robotics has the potential to support outpatient care, it is not yet sufficiently adapted to patients' needs and home environments. Technical limitations, dependence on family members and the higher acceptance of simpler technologies highlight the need for further development for a widespread implementation of assistive systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42747453What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.