ArticleReproduction & fertility2026
A decade of semen quality trends in Libya: nonlinear temporal patterns, age effects, and WHO 2010-2021 reclassification.
Article in Reproduction & fertility, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractReports of declining sperm concentration, count, and motility remain contested amid methodological heterogeneity, geographic bias, and reference-limit changes, and data from the Middle East and North Africa are scarce. We conducted a retrospective single-center cohort study of 3,078 men undergoing first diagnostic semen analysis at the National Fertility Teaching Center, Eastern Libya, between 2016 and 2025/26, with stable personnel, equipment, and protocols. Multivariable regression adjusted for age and semen volume assessed temporal trends, using restricted cubic splines for nonlinearity, robust sensitivity analyses, and Benjamini-Hochberg correction; samples were classified under both WHO 2010 and WHO 2021 reference limits. Calendar year showed small but statistically significant associations with semen volume (-0.028 mL/year, P = 0.005), normal morphology (-1.7%/year, P = 0.012), and total motility (+0.43 percentage points/year, P = 0.014); declines in sperm concentration and total sperm count were directionally similar but nonsignificant after correction, and effect sizes were modest throughout (adjusted R2 ≤ 0.033). All five non-volume parameters followed a nonlinear trajectory, peaking around 2019-2020, declining through 2022-2023, and partially recovering; the decline appeared more pronounced in men under 45 years, with older men comparatively stable - an exploratory finding discussed further below. Applying WHO 2021 criteria reduced asthenozoospermia prevalence from 53.8 to 48.6% and increased oligozoospermia prevalence from 35.7 to 37.0%. In this Eastern Libyan clinical population, semen parameters changed modestly and nonlinearly rather than declining uniformly, with age-specific divergence and measurable WHO reclassification; findings should not be generalized to Libyan men overall but offer novel data from an underrepresented population and support continued surveillance and multicenter collaboration. LAY SUMMARY: This study investigated trends in male fertility by analyzing semen data from 3,078 men in Libya over a 10-year period (2016-2026). The researchers evaluated essential factors, including sperm count, movement, and shape. The findings revealed that sperm quality did not experience a straightforward decline but rather fluctuated unevenly over the decade. Furthermore, the data confirmed that older age is steadily linked to lower sperm quality. Finally, the study demonstrated that switching from older medical criteria to the updated 2021 World Health Organization guidelines changes how many men are classified as having fertility issues. These results highlight the critical need for clinics to adopt the latest global diagnostic standards, ensuring more accurate fertility assessments and better-tailored patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.