ArticleThe Journal of chiropractic education2026
Factors associated with student satisfaction in a chiropractic program at a South African university: A cross-sectional study.
Article in The Journal of chiropractic education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to identify factors associated with student satisfaction in a South African chiropractic program and to determine how these factors related to overall student satisfaction. Comparisons between the year of study and overall satisfaction were also investigated. Methods: A cross-sectional, quantitative study design was adopted. Data were collected via an online survey distributed to chiropractic students in undergraduate and postgraduate programs (n = 242). The adapted questionnaire rated satisfaction factors on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = completely dissatisfied to 5 = completely satisfied). Data analysis included frequency counts, descriptive statistics, exploratory factor analysis, and reliability analyses, along with normality and comparison analyses. Regression analysis determined the relationship between overall satisfaction and the identified factors. Results: A 50.83% response rate was achieved (n = 123). The exploratory factor analysis yielded 3 key factors: course, teaching and evaluation, and clinical training, as well as career guidance. Respondents expressed satisfaction with the course delivery and clinical training (median = 4.00) but were neutral regarding career guidance (median = 3.00). Course, Teaching and Evaluation Methods (P = .77), Clinical Training (P = .59), and Career Exploration After Graduation (P = .49) were statistically significant with General Satisfaction. All factors were positively associated with overall satisfaction, which was satisfactory (median = 4.00). Conclusions: Overall, students' satisfaction with the chiropractic program was high across the course, teaching and evaluation methods, and clinical training. Improvements are required in the career guidance domain, and student satisfaction declined between the academic years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.