ArticleMagnetic resonance (Gottingen, Germany)2026
Simulating the extraction of signal parameters and spectrograms for non-stationary NMR signals.
Article in Magnetic resonance (Gottingen, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Free induction decay (FID) signals in nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy are commonly analyzed using the fast Fourier transform (FFT). This simulation study evaluates complementary methods for short or non-stationary FID signals in which linewidth, dephasing, or decay behavior changes during acquisition. Simulated FIDs containing exponentially damped sinusoids, Gaussian-distributed frequencies, and time-dependent broadening were analyzed using FFT, short-time Fourier transform (STFT), wavelet transform, and direct nonlinear time-domain fitting. Simulations of finite collection windows show that point-sampled FIDs can approximate window-integrated signals after amplitude and phase correction when the collection window is sufficiently sharp and reproducible. FFT remains the fastest and most reliable approach for stationary, sufficiently long, high-signal-to-noise signals. Zero filling improves spectral interpolation but does not recover frequency resolution lost through short acquisition. STFT and wavelet methods reveal time-dependent frequency and decay behavior, although with reduced frequency resolution. Direct time-domain fitting can estimate amplitudes, frequencies, phases, and decay constants from very short, relatively simple FID segments, but its reliability depends on model selection, initial estimates, the number of signal components, and avoidance of local minima. These methods therefore serve complementary roles in analyzing stationary and non-stationary NMR signals.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.