Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42746584›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance (Gottingen, Germany)2026

Simulating the extraction of signal parameters and spectrograms for non-stationary NMR signals.

Jixin Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance (Gottingen, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jixin ChenDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Nanoscale & Quantum Phenomena Institute, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio 45701, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7381-0918

Funding

Super-Resolution Optical Mapping for DNA Analysis Using Triplex-Forming Oligonucleotides as Stochastic Molecular ProbesR15HG009972 · NHGRI · OHIO UNIVERSITY ATHENS · PI CHEN, JIXIN · 2018 to 2023
$900k
NHGRI NIH HHS R15 HG009972
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Free induction decay (FID) signals in nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy are commonly analyzed using the fast Fourier transform (FFT). This simulation study evaluates complementary methods for short or non-stationary FID signals in which linewidth, dephasing, or decay behavior changes during acquisition. Simulated FIDs containing exponentially damped sinusoids, Gaussian-distributed frequencies, and time-dependent broadening were analyzed using FFT, short-time Fourier transform (STFT), wavelet transform, and direct nonlinear time-domain fitting. Simulations of finite collection windows show that point-sampled FIDs can approximate window-integrated signals after amplitude and phase correction when the collection window is sufficiently sharp and reproducible. FFT remains the fastest and most reliable approach for stationary, sufficiently long, high-signal-to-noise signals. Zero filling improves spectral interpolation but does not recover frequency resolution lost through short acquisition. STFT and wavelet methods reveal time-dependent frequency and decay behavior, although with reduced frequency resolution. Direct time-domain fitting can estimate amplitudes, frequencies, phases, and decay constants from very short, relatively simple FID segments, but its reliability depends on model selection, initial estimates, the number of signal components, and avoidance of local minima. These methods therefore serve complementary roles in analyzing stationary and non-stationary NMR signals.

Identifiers

PMID42746584
PMCPMC13576740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.