Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42746528›Full record

ArticlePatterns (New York, N.Y.)2026

EmmaEmb: A quantitative framework for analyzing embedding spaces in molecular biology.

Pia Francesca Rissom, Vít Škrhák, Paulo Yanez Sarmiento, Jordan F Safer, Connor W Coley, Bernhard Y Renard, Henrike O Heyne, Sumaiya Iqbal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patterns (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pia Francesca RissomHasso Plattner Institute, Digital Engineering Faculty, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Vít ŠkrhákBioinformatics and Machine Learning, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Paulo Yanez SarmientoHasso Plattner Institute, Digital Engineering Faculty, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Jordan F SaferBioinformatics and Machine Learning, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Connor W ColeyDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Bernhard Y RenardHasso Plattner Institute, Digital Engineering Faculty, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Henrike O HeyneHasso Plattner Institute, Digital Engineering Faculty, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Sumaiya IqbalBioinformatics and Machine Learning, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Embeddings, numerical vectors learned by deep-learning models, are increasingly used to represent complex molecular biology data and support predictive tasks and generative design. There is a growing need for systematic approaches to interpret and explain the information encoded in high-dimensional embedding spaces. Here, we introduce EmmaEmb, a quantitative, model-agnostic framework for geometric correction, direct analysis, and comparison of embedding spaces. Our framework encompasses local and global analysis methods to quantify data distribution within an embedding space and enable comparisons of representations across spaces in relation to known biological features. Through experiments with seven embedding models across six molecular biology tasks, we demonstrate that our methods reveal insights from embedding spaces that align with downstream predictive tasks, uncover misclassification patterns, and contextualize differences in biological information captured by ProtT5, AlphaFold2, and ESM C. We provide an open-source Python library implementing all analysis methods and a guided diagnostic workflow.

Indexed as

embedding comparisonembedding interpretabilityembedding spaceserror detectionfoundation modelsmolecular biologypairwise comparisonprotein language modelstransfer learningvector space analysis

Identifiers

PMID42746528
PMCPMC13576657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.