ReviewCureus2026
Clinical Outcomes of Image-Guided Spinal Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy for Metastatic Epidural Spinal Disease: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) causes pain, neurological deficits, and reduced quality of life. While open surgery and radiotherapy are standard treatments, frail patients are often poor surgical candidates. Image-guided spinal laser interstitial thermal therapy (sLITT) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to reduce epidural tumor burden and facilitate radiotherapy. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science (inception to 31 January 2026) for clinical reports on image-guided sLITT for malignant epidural spinal disease treated with decompressive intent. Two reviewers extracted data, with a third resolving discrepancies. Meta-analysis was precluded by clinical heterogeneity and potential cohort overlap, yielding seven included studies. The included studies evaluated standalone magnetic resonance-guided sLITT, hybrid sLITT with percutaneous stabilization, and sLITT combined with stereotactic radiotherapy. Reported outcomes suggested short-term improvements in epidural tumor thickness and epidural spinal cord compression (ESCC) grade, neurological stability, brief hospitalizations, and lower perioperative resource use compared to open surgery in one matched observational study. However, safety reporting was heterogeneous, and the certainty of evidence was very low due to small sample sizes, retrospective designs, short follow-up, and inconsistent outcome measurements. Image-guided sLITT appears feasible for carefully selected patients with metastatic epidural disease, but evidence regarding durable neurological benefit, survival, and long-term local control remains uncertain. Larger, prospective multicenter studies utilizing standardized neurological, radiographic, safety, and patient-reported outcomes are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.