ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026
Bedside bronchoscopy in intubated patients with acute exacerbation of COPD requiring invasive mechanical ventilation: clinical applications, procedural timing, and standardized management.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Bedside bronchoscopy is a valuable diagnostic and therapeutic tool for intubated patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) receiving invasive mechanical ventilation, yet evidence-based guidance on procedural timing remains limited. Methods: This narrative review synthesized evidence from guidelines, systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, and clinical studies identified through PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Chinese databases (CNKI, Wanfang) from inception through June 2026. Selection was iterative and based on relevance to the four clinical scenarios examined. Results: The available evidence suggests that bedside bronchoscopy may be associated with improved oxygenation, reduced ventilator days, lower VAP rates, and facilitated weaning. We propose a preliminary four-scenario framework for procedural timing: early post-intubation, during mechanical ventilation, pre-extubation (at the proposed pulmonary infection control window), and post-extubation failure. Key aspects of standardized management-including pre-procedural risk assessment, ventilator adjustments, sedation strategies, intraprocedural monitoring, and post-procedural care-are discussed, with special attention to resource constraints in secondary hospital ICUs. Discussion: The evidence base remains limited and predominantly derived from small, single-center studies, many with potential risk of bias. This framework is hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before informing clinical practice recommendations. Future pragmatic multicenter randomized trials are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.