Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42746364›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Comparative Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy and Post-contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Intracranial Ring-Enhancing Lesions.

Roopshree Bode, Amit Kumar, Kashi Nath Sarkar, Baidya Nath Singh, Vijendra Ruprela, Harshad Ruprela, Ritika Nihal, Davidson Shandilya, Rajshree Ganjeer, Janganagari Anil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Roopshree BodeDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Raipur Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, IND.
Amit KumarDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Raipur Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, IND.
Kashi Nath SarkarDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Raipur Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, IND.
Baidya Nath SinghDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Raipur Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, IND.
Vijendra RuprelaDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Raipur Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, IND.
Harshad RuprelaDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Raipur Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, IND.
Ritika NihalDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Raipur Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, IND.
Davidson ShandilyaDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Raipur Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, IND.
Rajshree GanjeerDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Raipur Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, IND.
Janganagari AnilDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Raipur Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Intracranial ring-enhancing lesions are diagnostically heterogeneous because infective, neoplastic, demyelinating, and vascular etiologies may show overlapping conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) appearances. This study evaluated and compared the diagnostic performance of post-contrast MRI and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) in the etiological characterization of intracranial ring-enhancing lesions. Materials and methods This hospital-based prospective observational, non-interventional study included 45 patients with intracranial ring-enhancing lesions. All patients underwent conventional MRI, diffusion-weighted imaging, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) assessment, post-contrast imaging, and MRS. Lesion morphology, enhancement pattern, diffusion characteristics, ADC findings, and spectroscopic metabolite patterns were recorded. Final etiological diagnosis was established using a composite reference standard based on histopathology, microbiology, therapeutic response, and clinicoradiological follow-up, wherever available. Categorical variables were summarized as frequencies and percentages. Associations between imaging findings and final diagnosis were assessed statistically, and diagnostic performance was calculated using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Results Infective lesions were the most common etiology, accounting for 62.2% of cases, followed by neoplastic lesions in 17.8%, demyelinating lesions in 11.1%, and vascular lesions in 8.9%. Perilesional edema was present in all cases, while mass effect showed a statistically significant association with lesion etiology. Central necrosis and qualitative diffusion restriction were not significantly associated with final diagnosis. ADC assessment showed better diagnostic correlation with lesion etiology. MRS demonstrated stronger diagnostic separation than post-contrast imaging, particularly through elevated choline-based ratios in neoplastic lesions and lipid-lactate patterns in infective lesions. Post-contrast MRI showed sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 86.7%, 75.0%, 81.2%, and 80.0%, respectively. MRS showed higher corresponding values of 93.3%, 85.0%, 87.5%, and 91.0%, respectively. Conclusions Post-contrast MRI remains essential for anatomical localization and morphological assessment of intracranial ring-enhancing lesions, but its independent diagnostic specificity is limited by overlapping enhancement patterns. MRS provides additional metabolic information and demonstrated superior diagnostic performance in this study. A multiparametric MRI approach combining morphology, diffusion assessment, ADC evaluation, post-contrast imaging, and spectroscopy improves non-invasive etiological characterization and may support more confident clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

apparent diffusion coefficientbrain abscessdiffusion-weighted imagingintracranial ring lesionsmagnetic resonance imagingmagnetic resonance spectroscopyneurocysticercosispost-contrast mriring-enhancing lesionstuberculoma

Identifiers

PMID42746364
PMCPMC13575815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.