ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
BCG after trimodality therapy: managing non-muscle-invasive recurrence in the irradiated bladder.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Trimodality therapy (TMT) is an established bladder-preserving option for selected patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer, but non-muscle-invasive recurrence remains a clinically relevant challenge. The role of intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) after prior bladder-directed chemoradiation is uncertain because the available evidence is limited to small retrospective cohorts and indirect studies in previously irradiated bladders. This mini-review examines the efficacy and tolerability of BCG after TMT, the uncertain role of maintenance therapy, and the factors that should guide continued bladder preservation versus salvage cystectomy. Across available post-TMT series, BCG was feasible and durable disease control occurred in some patients; however, the small, highly selected cohorts are vulnerable to selection bias and limited statistical power, precluding definitive comparative claims or definition of an optimal induction or maintenance strategy. Careful staging is essential because radiation-related changes may complicate endoscopic assessment and pathologic interpretation. BCG may be considered when recurrence is clearly non-muscle-invasive, endoscopically manageable, and the bladder remains functional, with salvage cystectomy still feasible if treatment fails. Uncertain staging, incomplete resection, persistent or early recurrent high-risk disease, BCG-unresponsive recurrence, or poor bladder function should lower the threshold for cystectomy. Prospective studies should incorporate oncologic outcomes, treatment completion, urinary function, and cystectomy-free survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.