ArticlePulmonary circulation2026
Clinical Outcomes of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: A Retrospective Cohort Study From a Latin American Care Center.
Article in Pulmonary circulation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a distinct subtype of pulmonary hypertension arising from persistent major pulmonary artery obstruction after pulmonary embolism. Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) remains the standard of care, but up to 40% of patients in European and US registries are inoperable; balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) has emerged as a more accessible interventional modality for suitable patients. This retrospective single-center cohort study evaluated functional improvement, hemodynamic response, and mortality in patients with CTEPH ineligible for PEA who underwent BPA at a Colombian institution (May 2022-October 2025). Risk was stratified using COMPERA 2.0. The primary outcome was improvement of at least one New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class; secondary outcomes were change in mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) and all-cause mortality during follow-up. Of 33 patients (median age 63 years; 70% female), 5 (15.1%) were high risk at baseline, 16 (48.4%) intermediate-high, 10 (30.3%) intermediate-low, and 2 (6%) low risk. After BPA, 19 patients (58%) improved NYHA class (95% CI, 39.2%-74.5%), and mPAP fell from 60 (IQR 50-68) to 40 mmHg (IQR 37-48) after a median of three sessions (IQR 2-4) (mean paired reduction 14.05 mmHg, 95% credible interval 9.81-18.07; Hedges' g = 1.22, 95% CI 0.77-1.66). Two deaths (6.0%) occurred, both in high-risk patients. BPA improved NYHA class and pulmonary hemodynamics in severe, inoperable CTEPH, with a low complication rate despite advanced baseline disease. COMPERA 2.0 stratified baseline severity but did not predict the magnitude of hemodynamic response to BPA, consistent with the mechanical nature of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.