ArticleCureus2026
Ethical and Legal Considerations in the Refusal of Antipsychotic Treatment During Pregnancy: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute psychosis during pregnancy creates a complex clinical scenario that requires simultaneous consideration of maternal psychiatric stabilization and fetal well-being. Guidance remains limited on the management of acutely psychotic pregnant patients who lack decision-making capacity and refuse care, particularly in settings without on-site obstetric resources. We describe the case of a 35-year-old woman with schizoaffective disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder who was involuntarily committed for acute behavioral disturbance and found to be approximately 14 weeks pregnant during evaluation. She remained acutely psychotic, with persistent paranoid and grandiose delusions, impaired self-care, and disruptive, sometimes aggressive behavior. A formal capacity assessment determined that she lacked the capacity to make informed decisions about psychiatric treatment or pregnancy-related care. She refused antipsychotic medication, laboratory testing, and prenatal care, and de-escalation efforts were unsuccessful. Because the treating facility lacked on-site obstetric services and pharmacologic treatment carried fetal risks that the patient could not weigh, the team pursued transfer to a facility with both psychiatric and obstetric capabilities rather than a forced-medication hearing. After 20 days, she was transferred under commitment to a state hospital. This case illustrates that pregnancy transforms an already difficult involuntary-treatment decision into a multidimensional legal, ethical, and systems problem and highlights that early pregnancy screening, predefined transfer pathways, and multidisciplinary review should guide management when acute psychosis and pregnancy intersect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.