ArticleEcology and evolution2026
From Data to Discovery: Characterizing the Scope and Limitations of Seedling Trait Studies in the U.S. With the EPiC Database.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The seedling stage is a uniquely vulnerable and influential period of the plant life cycle with outsized impacts on plant recruitment, and population and community dynamics. Despite this, plant morphology, structure, and function during the seedling stage often differ markedly from later developmental stages, complicating generalizations about ecological strategy across ontogeny. Trait-based ecology offers a valuable framework to understand how functional variation shapes plant performance at early-life stages and its ecological consequences. Yet, trait-based approaches applied at the seedling stage remain limited and inconsistent across studies. To address these limitations, our systematic review of 181 published studies investigated seedling traits of native grass, forb, and shrub species across diverse environmental conditions in the continental United States. Following extraction of covariates, we identified emergent patterns, limitations, and opportunities to expand seedling functional ecology, particularly in relation to regeneration strategies. We found that most studies focused on individuals younger than 90 days old, with only 24% of studies measuring seedling traits beyond this window. Most research emphasized morphological traits (36%), followed by performance/growth (34%), physiological (15%), and phenological traits (13%), with aboveground biomass as the most studied trait. We identified nearly 300 traits but suggest future research efforts focus on key traits for better comparability of seedling responses. Most taxa were in Poaceae (24%) and Asteraceae (25%) families, and nearly 60% of field studies were conducted in dryland ecoregions. Water availability was the most frequently manipulated abiotic factor (39%), while physical disturbance-despite its central role in ecosystem dynamics-was rarely examined (5%). To advance seedling functional ecology and its relevance in applied and community assembly contexts, greater representation of phenological and belowground traits is needed alongside evaluations in diverse environments in the US. Measuring traits that span distinct ontogenetic stages, ecoregions, and taxonomic groups will advance understanding of plant regeneration under accelerating change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.