Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42746159›Full record

ReviewJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2026

Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Cognitive Function Management in Middle-Aged and Older Adults with Hypertension: A Scoping Review.

Jiliang Luo, Yingmei Yuan, Junling Du, Wenting Fang, Wenshu Duan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jiliang LuoCollege of Nursing, Dali University, Dali, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0005-2273-9070
Yingmei YuanCollege of Nursing, Dali University, Dali, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-1901-4440
Junling DuCollege of Nursing, Dali University, Dali, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0003-6635-3722
Wenting FangCollege of Nursing, Dali University, Dali, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0007-1137-2204
Wenshu DuanCollege of Humanities, Dehong Vocational College, Mangshi, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0004-8728-1761

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hypertension is an increasing public health concern across adulthood, including among young adults, and remains highly prevalent in middle-aged and older populations. In this review, middle-aged adults were defined as individuals aged 45 years or older, and older adults as individuals aged 60 years or older. Hypertension is also a modifiable vascular risk factor for cognitive decline and dementia, and cognitive impairment is common among patients with hypertension. Persistent blood pressure elevation may impair cognition through vascular injury, cerebral hypoperfusion and small-vessel disease. Non-pharmacological strategies such as exercise, lifestyle modification, sleep management, psychological support, cognitive rehabilitation and nursing follow-up may support both blood pressure management and cognitive health, but the evidence is scattered across heterogeneous populations and interventions. Methods: A scoping review-style evidence mapping was conducted with reference to the Arksey and O'Malley framework, subsequent methodological guidance, and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). A systematic search of Chinese and English databases was conducted from the earliest available record in each database to June 2026. Studies were eligible if they involved middle-aged or older adults with hypertension or hypertension-related cognitive risk, evaluated a non-pharmacological intervention, and reported at least one cognitive outcome. Data were charted on population, study design, intervention components, duration, outcome measures and main findings. Findings were synthesized narratively and thematically. Results: Only eight intervention studies, representing a total of 932 participants, met the inclusion criteria, indicating a limited evidence base. Study designs included randomized controlled or randomized intervention studies, a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest study, a prospective controlled community study, a follow-up analysis of a randomized trial, and nursing intervention studies. Four intervention themes were identified: exercise-based interventions, lifestyle and sleep management, health education with emotional or psychological support, and cognitive rehabilitation with continuing nursing management. Potential benefits were reported for memory, working memory, global cognition, activities of daily living, quality of life, blood pressure control, adherence or self-management. However, the included studies varied substantially in population, intervention intensity, duration, study design and outcome measures. Conclusion: The available evidence suggests that non-pharmacological interventions may have potential benefits for cognitive and related clinical outcomes in adults with hypertension, but the findings should be interpreted cautiously because only eight heterogeneous intervention studies were identified. Current evidence is insufficient to determine the most effective intervention components or delivery models. Larger, well-designed studies with standardized cognitive outcomes, longer follow-up and clearly reported intervention intensity and adherence are needed.

Indexed as

cognitive functioncognitive rehabilitationhypertensionnon-pharmacological interventionnursingolder adultsscoping review

Identifiers

PMID42746159
PMCPMC13575609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.