Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42746119›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Clinical Applications, Opportunities, and Implementation Challenges of AI in Emergency Medicine: A Narrative Review.

Nabeel Ashiq, Fouzia Munir, Adil Yousaf

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nabeel AshiqEmergency Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT.
Fouzia MunirEmergency Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT.
Adil YousafPharmacology, Green Health Pharmaceutical Company, Riyadh, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

EDs operate in high-acuity, time-sensitive, and resource-constrained environments where crowding, diagnostic uncertainty, boarding, variable patient acuity, and increasing documentation demands place substantial pressure on clinicians and health systems. AI, including machine learning, deep learning, natural language processing, computer vision, predictive analytics, and large language models (LLMs), is increasingly being investigated as a supportive technology for emergency care. This narrative review summarizes current and emerging applications of AI in emergency medicine, with emphasis on triage and risk stratification, diagnostic decision support, emergency imaging, patient-flow optimization, LLMs, and implementation governance. The strongest near-term applications are likely to be those that address clearly defined clinical or operational tasks, use available electronic health record or imaging data, integrate into existing workflows, and undergo prospective validation in the intended setting. AI may support earlier recognition of high-risk patients, prioritization of critical imaging findings, prediction of hospital admission or deterioration, drafting and summarization of clinical documentation, and operational planning. However, evidence remains uneven across use cases. Important barriers include limited external validation, dataset shift, bias, false alarms, alert fatigue, lack of interpretability, privacy risks, uncertain liability, regulatory complexity, and difficulty demonstrating patient-centered outcome improvement. LLMs introduce additional risks, including hallucination, outdated information, unsafe recommendations, and privacy concerns, and should not be used as autonomous decision-makers in emergency care. Responsible implementation requires human oversight, local validation, post-deployment monitoring, equity assessment, governance, and alignment with emergency clinician workflows. AI should be viewed as a tool to augment, not replace, emergency physicians and multidisciplinary ED teams.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceclinical decision supportdigital healthemergency departmentemergency medicinelarge language modelsmachine learningtriage

Identifiers

PMID42746119
PMCPMC13575288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.