ReviewCureus2026
Clinical Applications, Opportunities, and Implementation Challenges of AI in Emergency Medicine: A Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
EDs operate in high-acuity, time-sensitive, and resource-constrained environments where crowding, diagnostic uncertainty, boarding, variable patient acuity, and increasing documentation demands place substantial pressure on clinicians and health systems. AI, including machine learning, deep learning, natural language processing, computer vision, predictive analytics, and large language models (LLMs), is increasingly being investigated as a supportive technology for emergency care. This narrative review summarizes current and emerging applications of AI in emergency medicine, with emphasis on triage and risk stratification, diagnostic decision support, emergency imaging, patient-flow optimization, LLMs, and implementation governance. The strongest near-term applications are likely to be those that address clearly defined clinical or operational tasks, use available electronic health record or imaging data, integrate into existing workflows, and undergo prospective validation in the intended setting. AI may support earlier recognition of high-risk patients, prioritization of critical imaging findings, prediction of hospital admission or deterioration, drafting and summarization of clinical documentation, and operational planning. However, evidence remains uneven across use cases. Important barriers include limited external validation, dataset shift, bias, false alarms, alert fatigue, lack of interpretability, privacy risks, uncertain liability, regulatory complexity, and difficulty demonstrating patient-centered outcome improvement. LLMs introduce additional risks, including hallucination, outdated information, unsafe recommendations, and privacy concerns, and should not be used as autonomous decision-makers in emergency care. Responsible implementation requires human oversight, local validation, post-deployment monitoring, equity assessment, governance, and alignment with emergency clinician workflows. AI should be viewed as a tool to augment, not replace, emergency physicians and multidisciplinary ED teams.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.