ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026
From chemistry to cognition: the adaptive origins of consciousness under constraint.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Consciousness is often treated as an evolutionary anomaly, a costly capacity with unclear adaptive origins. Here, cognition and consciousness are distinguished as separate evolutionary lineages, with consciousness arising when an organism must coordinate otherwise distinct regulatory processes to resolve competing demands affecting its own viability. Its functional precursors predate nervous systems, emerging first in boundary-preserving chemical and metabolic regulation. An evolutionary ladder is developed in which proto-control preserves boundaries by selectively permitting, inhibiting, and localizing destruction; meta-control arbitrates among competing local controllers; and settlement control resolves conflict by making competing regulatory demands comparable and jointly binding for policy selection. It follows that artificial consciousness will not emerge from greater cognitive sophistication alone; it will require self-maintaining systems that settle competing demands under real constraint. The framework yields six falsifiable predictions spanning comparative biology, neuroscience, and artificial intelligence. On this view, consciousness is not evolution's anomaly but its solution: self-anchored, cross-domain settlement under constraint.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.