ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026
Lipidomic analysis of isolated lipid droplets reveals potential metabolic pathway differences between medulloblastoma subgroups.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Medulloblastomas (MBs) are a highly aggressive paediatric brain tumour which is very difficult to treat. Lipid metabolism has emerged as a crucial determinant of tumour progression, metastasis and therapy resistance in MBs. Lipid droplets (LDs) are lipid-rich organelles that store neutral lipids; their biology and function remain poorly characterised within MBs. Methods: MB cells from the low-aggressive Sonic hedgehog (SHH) subgroup (DAOY, UW228-2) and the high-aggressive group 3 (G4) and group 4 (G4) subgroups (D458, D283) were treated with 80 μM oleic acid (OA), 50 μM cholesterol (Chol) or a mix to induce LD formation. LDs were isolated, and lipidomic analysis was performed. Results: No lipid species were consistently upregulated across all cell lines under any treatment condition. SHH cell lines exhibited a broad and consistent lipidomic response across all three treatments, resulting in a pronounced triacylglyceride (TAG) and cholesterol ester (CE) storage profile. The more aggressive subgroups exhibited a more selective, OA-driven phenotype, characterised by longer-chain TAG and CE species. Across all cell lines, OA produced the strongest LD expansion and metabolic separation, whereas Chol elicited a more restricted but highly subgroup-specific signature. G3/G4 Chol responses provide evidence for lipid metabolism rewiring, which could be responsible for the more aggressive phenotype. Discussion: These findings demonstrate that MB subtypes not only exhibit distinct basal lipid signatures but also engage in fundamentally different lipid remodelling in response to FA overload. These distinct lipid-handling signatures display metabolic heterogeneity across MB subgroups and suggest subtype-specific vulnerabilities. Overall, these findings position LD remodelling as a potential metabolic target of MB cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.