ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
AI-based prediction of pulmonary hypertension in COPD patients with cor pulmonale using clinical and CT features.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives: This study aimed to characterize COPD with clinically defined cor pulmonale and to develop clinical and contrast-enhanced CT-based AI-assisted models for its identification. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 179 patients with COPD (90 COPD alone and 89 COPD with cor pulmonale). Clinical, laboratory, pulmonary function, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic data were compared. To reduce incorporation bias, right ventricular, right atrial, and pulmonary artery measurements and electrocardiographic variables used in the operational case definition were excluded from candidate predictors. Variables associated with cor pulmonale in univariable analysis were entered simultaneously into multivariable logistic regression. A conservative sensitivity analysis additionally excluded mMRC score because dyspnea contributed to clinical case ascertainment. In 63 patients with diagnostic-quality CT angiography, pulmonary artery volumes were quantified using a U-Net model. Results: In the revised multivariable clinical model ( Conclusion: A revised clinical model that excluded variables incorporated into the diagnostic definition retained good discrimination for clinically defined cor pulmonale. AI-assisted quantification of small pulmonary vessels may provide complementary non-invasive information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.