ArticleChina CDC weekly2026
Targeted Cycloplegia in Refractive Screening of Children and Adolescents: Development and Internal Validation of a Pre-Cycloplegia Risk Prediction Model - 10 PLADs, China, 2020-2024.
Article in China CDC weekly, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cycloplegic refraction is the gold standard for accurate refractive assessment in children and adolescents, but its use is limited by operational complexity and low acceptance. Because effective tools for identifying individuals who require cycloplegia are lacking, this study aimed to develop a risk prediction model for refractive misclassification based on pre-cycloplegia parameters to assist targeted cycloplegic refraction. Methods: A total of 43,760 children and adolescents aged 5-18 years were enrolled from 10 provincial-level administrative divisions in China using stratified cluster probability-proportional-to-size (PPS) sampling. Pre-cycloplegia data, including individual characteristics, ocular indicators, and lifestyle factors, were collected. Binary logistic regression was used to develop the model, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine the optimal cutoff value. Results: The final model included six core variables and achieved an overall classification accuracy of 79.4% and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.730. The optimal cutoff score was 18.4. Moderate or low uncorrected visual acuity and abnormal axial length were major risk factors, whereas a higher school stage was protective. Conclusion: The prediction model demonstrated favorable performance and identified individuals at high risk of refractive misclassification. Individuals with a risk score ≥18.4 may be prioritized for cycloplegic refraction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.